Below is a public lecture I gave in Brisbane, Australia on 23 October 2023 on US grand strategy. The talk focuses on how America’s deep involvement in the Ukraine war and now the Hamas-Israel war is hindering the all-important pivot to Asia.
Nationalism as a policy of enduring geopolitical value should be more important than the delusions associated with liberal hegemony. In a related article from 2019, Mearsheimer presupposes that the U.S.-led liberal international order was destined to collapse from the start. John Mearsheimer! These statements you make are utter nonsense, and you are making excuses for the rule of authoritarian anti-human regimes! There is no such thing as liberal hegemony! And your realist view that "interactions between great powers are described as primarily driven by a rational desire to achieve regional hegemony in an anarchic international system" is inherently problematic and wrong and unfounded! The fact is that some democracies help their own popular allies everywhere because they defend themselves against the expansion of their enemy's authoritarian allies to maintain their own security! The realist perspective ignores popular oversight and control of elected officials and power, which is completely unrealistic! Even if one can't assume that the leaders of a democracy won't make bad decisions just by trusting their materialism, the oversight and control of officials and public power of all kinds in a democracy is effective in curbing such mistakes! The control of power in a democracy is the control of public power not to do anything wrong on a more realistic level! The realist kind of willful ignorance of the fact that people make decisions because of their own values that are not necessarily the same as other values is patently false! And nationalism is a narrow and grossly offensive value, and it is often used by dictators to incite hatred against foreign countries, especially democracies, to distract or even counteract the attention of the population from domestic conflicts and wrong policies! How can this be good for regional peace and security if the world is full of such dictators who incite hatred for the sake of authoritarian rule? Do you have the courage to answer me this question? And it is the regimes controlled by those anti-humanists who deprive people of their rights for the benefit of authoritarian rule that are the real hegemonies! Some countries oppose and attack democrats simply because of their extremely stupid and ignorant minds! It only proves that such ignorant people are not highly civilised. You rumour-mongering pro-authoritarian media always spread irrational disinformation under the guise of the so-called anti-mainstream media, pretending that you are the real deal! Stop playing such childish tricks! And you say "Putin is pursuing a realistic geopolitical programme to secure Russia's national interests in the face of the ever-expanding threat of NATO." It is even more irrational in the extreme! You are completely delusional in trying to rationalise Putin's invasion! You don't always look at things wrongly and imperfectly with your irrational realism of events! Ukraine is autonomously trying to join the EU in order to develop its economy, not NATO-initiated expansion as you claim! Your statement "If China's power is extended to Canada and Mexico is absolutely different in nature! Because Ukraine has legitimacy to join other organisations as a popularly empowered democracy and has no ambitions to undermine security, and Ukraine is not provoking Russia militarily! Whereas the Chinese government is an absolute authoritarian and anti-human government that does not even have a one-person, one-vote electoral system, and is itself opposed to democracy and freedom, China's political and military expansion with the post-expansion purpose of violating and destroying democratic countries is clearly illegitimate and will definitely undermine regional security! China's expansion for the post-expansion purpose of violating and destabilising democracies to maintain the stability of dictatorships is obvious, cannot be ruled out at all and is extremely probable! As a democracy the Ukrainian government and elected officials are unquestionably qualified to honour the choices made by the population in terms of economy and security! And what you are saying is a completely delusional attempt to rationalise Russia's invasion and crimes! And I'll say it again! The world is simply not explained away by your highly irrational realism with ignorant dialectical overtones! Rather, it is driven by a variety of values and ideas, like the famous saying that all history is the history of ideas. Only values that do not harm the rights and freedoms of the population can create peace and prosperity! Your claim that the US-led liberal democratic world order must be destroyed is also completely illogical and impossible! What is possible is only that the United States will no longer lead the liberal-democratic world order, not that the liberal-democratic world order will disappear from the world!
與自由主義霸權相關的錯覺相比，民族主義作為一種具有持久地緣政治價值的政策應該更加重要。 在2019年的一篇相關文章中，米爾斯海預設為，美國領導的自由國際秩序從一開始就註定要崩潰。 John Mearsheimer！你所说的这些言论完全就是胡扯，你这是在为专制反人类政权的统治找借口！ 根本不存在所谓的 自由主义霸权！还有你所认为的“大國之間的互動描述為主要是由在無政府國際體系中實現地區霸權的理性願望驅動的”你的这种现实主义观点本来就是有问题和错误的和没有根据的！事实是有些民主国家因为防备敌人专制盟友的扩张维护自身安全而帮助各地自己的民众盟友！现实主义视角忽略了民众对民选的官员和权力的监督与控制，这完全是不现实的！哪怕不能只通过信任民主国家领导人的唯心主义来认为他们不会做出错误决定，但是民主制度下的对官员和各种公权力的监督与控制是可以有效的遏制这种错误的发生！民主制度对权力的控制就是从更加现实些的层面控制公权力不要胡作非为！现实主义那种故意无视人们因为自己价值观而做出的和其他价值观所不一定相同的决定是明显错误的！而且民族主义是狭隘和严重侵犯人权的价值观，而且独裁者经常使用民族主义来煽动对外国尤其是对民主国家的仇恨来转移甚至抵消民众对国内矛盾和错误政策的注意力！如果世界到处是这种为了专制统治而煽动仇恨的独裁者那么这又怎么可能对区域和平安全有利呢？你有没有勇气回答我这个问题？而且那些为了专制统治利益而剥夺民众权利的反人类者掌控的政权才是真正的霸权！有些国家对民主人士的反对和攻击仅仅是因为其极度愚昧无知的思想！只能证明这种愚昧的人不是高度文明的。你们这些制造谣言的亲专制媒体总是打着所谓的反主流媒体的幌子散布不合理的虚假信息，伪装你们才是真实的！别再玩这种幼稚的把戏了！而且你说“普京正在推行一項現實主義的地緣政治計劃，以在北約不斷擴張的威脅面前確保俄羅斯的國家利益。”更是不合理到极点！你完全是妄想合理化普京的入侵！你不要总用你那不合理的现实主义事件来错误且不完善地看待问题！乌克兰是自主想加入欧盟为了发展本国经济，并不是像你说的那样是北约主动扩张！你说什么“如果中国的权势扩大到加拿大和墨西哥有着性质上的绝对不同！因为乌克兰作为一个由民众授权的民主国家加入其他组织是有合法性的，而且没有破坏安全的野心，乌克兰并没有军事挑衅俄国！而中国政府是一个连一人一票选举制度都不存在的绝对专制反人类政府，其本身就是反对民主自由的，那么中国以侵犯破坏民主国家为扩张后的目的而进行政治和军事扩张明显是不合法且一定会破坏区域安全的！中国因侵犯破坏民主国家维持独裁统治稳定而扩张是很明显的，是完全不能排除且极其有可能的！作为一个民主国家乌克兰政府和民选官员毫无疑问有资格履行民众对经济和安全方面做出的选择！而你所说的完全是妄想合理化俄国的入侵与罪行！我还要在说一次！这世界根本不是以你那极度不合理的带有无知的辩证法色彩的现实主义可以解释通的！而是由各种价值观和思想驱动的，就像那句名言：一切的历史都是思想史。 只有不伤害民众的权利和自由的价值观才能造就和平与繁荣！你所说的美国领导的自由民主的世界秩序一定会毁灭也完全是不合逻辑且不可能的！有一点可能的也只是美国不再领导自由民主的世界秩序，而非世界上消失了自由民主的世界秩序！
Great analysis of where we are here in the west vis s vis Ukraine and Israel, how we got there, and how it seems there is no good solution. I was naively waiting for that good solution to pop up at the end of the talk - nope.
But at least an analysis like this gives people some facts and gets them thinking more about the issues.
Jews Albright and Clark (pictured in the link below) had NATO bomb Serbia so the IMF Jews could make loans for rebuilding and get control of Serbian iridium assets… while Saudi non-profit NGOs kept the KLA terrorists well fed and well-armed… Just like ISIS in Syria… their Zionist bedfellows on Wall Street want Ukraine for GMO grain crops . . . Monsanto (now Bayer), Genentech, ADM, etc., are all buying land with the help of the Jews at the IMF by giving the Ukrainian “Dill” idiots debt relief . . . https://cwspangle.substack.com/i/85711501/sodom-hussein-obama
Jewish U.S. Rep. Adam Schiff (D), great grandson of Jacob Schiff (who funded Bolshevism, Leon Trotsky, and the October Revolution from Wall Street) is following in his great grandfather’s footsteps by illegally trafficking weapons with Igor Pasternak (seated behind John Kerry in the link below), funding foreign conflicts abroad... and trying to get Syria for the oil pipelines by blaming the Russians for another false flag... https://cwspangle.substack.com/i/85711501/schiffty-schitty-kike-adam-schiffs-collusion-with-oligarch-ukrainian-arms-dealer-exposed
Sodom Hussein Obama's mentor Zbigniew Brzezinski (Mika’s father, next to Nasty Pelousy in the link below) was the monster in the Carter administration who armed and financed the Mujahedeen in Afghanistan to fight against the Soviets... after the Mujahedeen were armed with sophisticated weapons, the Soviets left, the result was the USA got 911, and women now can walk 3 paces behind the donkey, the Mujahedeen evolved into the Taliban, who evolved into Al-Qaeda, who evolved into ISIS/ISIL/Daesh... Brezinski, for all practical purposes, can be called the ‘Grandfather of ISIS’... https://cwspangle.substack.com/i/85711501/sodom-hussein-obama
Great John, as always. For the very first time I hear you explaining IR on the basis of religion: ultraorthodox jews. You always avoid to deepen so far in explaining IR, the bottom line is always nationalism. Search into religions and you will get and extra satisfactory cause for the behaviour of nations. Cheers, Toni Prunés, your Catalan translator.
Estic obligat a escriure en diversos idiomes perquè: 1. A la majoria de la gent dels Estats Units se'ls ha rentat el cervell perquè cregui que els jueus són la seva salvació; i 2., el seu anglès és una merda i no poden romandre en silenci el temps suficient per escoltar o veure el que òbviament passa al seu voltant . . .
El judeomessianisme fa gairebé dos mil anys que escampa entre nosaltres el seu missatge verinós. Els universalismes democràtics i comunistes són més recents, però només han reforçat la vella narrativa jueva. Són els mateixos ideals.
Els ideals transnacionals, transracials, transsexuals, transculturals que aquestes ideologies ens prediquen (més enllà dels pobles, races, cultures) i que són el sosteniment diari de les nostres escoles, als nostres mitjans de comunicació, a la nostra cultura popular, a les nostres universitats, i sobre al nostres els carrers han acabat reduint la nostra identitat biosimbòlica i el nostre orgull ètnic a la seva mínima expressió.
Els banquers jueus han inundat Europa amb musulmans i Amèrica amb escombraries del tercer món . . . L'exili com a càstig per als que predicen la sedició s'hauria de restablir dins el marc legal d'Occident . . .
El judaisme, el cristianisme i l'islam són cultes a la mort originats a l'Orient Mitjà i totalment aliens a Europa i als seus pobles.
De vegades ens preguntem per què l'esquerra europea es porta tan bé amb els musulmans. Per què un moviment sovint obertament antireligiós es posa del costat d'una religiositat ferotge que sembla oposar-se a gairebé tot allò que l'esquerra sempre ha pretès defensar? Part de l'explicació rau en el fet que l'islam i el marxisme tenen una arrel ideològica comuna: el judaisme.
Don Rumsfeld tenia raó quan va dir: "Europa s'ha desplaçat en el seu eix", va ser el bàndol equivocat que va guanyar la Segona Guerra Mundial, i es fa més clar cada dia . . . Què ha fet l'OTAN per defensar Europa? Absolutament res . . . Els meus enemics no són a Moscou, Damasc, Teheran, Riad o algun eteri bogeyman teutónic, els meus enemics són a Washington, Brussel·les i Tel Aviv.
Dr. Mearsheimer always says China is America's biggest threat but he never elaborates. What precisely are the dangers it poses to the United States? And what risks do China present to the rest of the world, especially the so-called global south that would warrant an American military engagement?
It is a painfully obvious fact that the United States government has become a wholly owned subsidiary of the American Israeli Political Action Commitee.
The USA should have helped Japan in WW2.
Commodore Matthew C. Perry sailed into Tokyo Bay with nine ships in March 1854 and forced Japan to enter into trade with the United States . . . Russia, Britain, France, and Holland used their fleets on several occasions to defeat and disarm the Japanese feudal domains that defied them.
The Black Dragon Society (Kyūjitai; 黑龍會; Shinjitai: 黒竜会, kokuryūkai), or the Amur River Society, was a prominent paramilitary, ultranationalist group in Japan. The Kokuryūkai was founded in 1901 by martial artist Uchida Ryohei as a successor to his mentor Mitsuru Tōyama's Gen'yōsha. The purpose of the organization was to keep the Russian Empire North of the Amur River and out of East Asia.
China isn't a direct threat to American security in the forseeable future; what they threaten is the American led world order. Since the fall of the USSR, uncle sam has had the final say on anything and everything that goes on in the world, because no one could challenge our power. But, with the rise of China, we are losing that special status and are headed towards a world where we have to accomodate what china wants. Very uncomfortable for us.
Commodore Matthew C. Perry sailed into Tokyo Bay with nine ships in March 1854 and forced Japan to enter into trade with the United States . . . Russia, Britain, France, and Holland used their fleets on several occasions to defeat and disarm the Japanese feudal domains that defied them.
The Black Dragon Society (Kyūjitai; 黑龍會; Shinjitai: 黒竜会, kokuryūkai), or the Amur River Society, was a prominent paramilitary, ultranationalist group in Japan. The Kokuryūkai was founded in 1901 by martial artist Uchida Ryohei as a successor to his mentor Mitsuru Tōyama's Gen'yōsha. The purpose of the organization was to keep the Russian Empire North of the Amur River and out of East Asia.
Global south should generally try to play both sides of the fence but a breakdown in the global order would almost certainly be bad for citizens of global South. How bad would depend on threats/challenges individual country faces. There is no good reason for military engagement with China in my opinion as I think our interests are aligned but apparently President Xi disagrees.
Professor Mearsheimer has said words to the effect that the US was mistaken to do things in the past that were beneficial to China but many American's disagreed and hoped China would become a friend in much the same way as so many other countries did. By that I mean who doesn't like Japanese cars, Korean music, inexpensive iron ore from Brazil or the big one, inexpensive oil from Saudi Arabia. All of that could break down if we go back to the way things used to be and China appears to want a new system. What that system would look like has not been made very clear and appears to be defined as the exact opposite of whatever the US wants.
" There is no good reason for military engagement with China in my opinion as I think our interests are aligned but apparently President Xi disagrees."
Gaslighting 101, pretending it is China that is the aggressor and not the USA.
It is a painfully obvious fact that the United States government has become a wholly owned subsidiary of the American Israeli Political Action Commitee.
The USA should have helped Japan in WW2.
Commodore Matthew C. Perry sailed into Tokyo Bay with nine ships in March 1854 and forced Japan to enter into trade with the United States . . . Russia, Britain, France, and Holland used their fleets on several occasions to defeat and disarm the Japanese feudal domains that defied them.
The Black Dragon Society (Kyūjitai; 黑龍會; Shinjitai: 黒竜会, kokuryūkai), or the Amur River Society, was a prominent paramilitary, ultranationalist group in Japan. The Kokuryūkai was founded in 1901 by martial artist Uchida Ryohei as a successor to his mentor Mitsuru Tōyama's Gen'yōsha. The purpose of the organization was to keep the Russian Empire North of the Amur River and out of East Asia.
As I understand it, Mearsheimer's framework doesn't bother with labels like "aggressor." Basically speaking, great power states are either pursuing a status quo grand strategy or an expansionist grand strategy. He's an offensive realist, meaning he believes that great power states will actively maximize their security and power relative to their neighbors, in pursuit of regional (or in the american case, global) hegemony. The US was more or less happy with the post cold war status quo when they were the sole hegemon, and pursued a grand strategy of "mopping up" the last vestiges of illiberal rogue states. The rise of China to the ranks of the great powers has come at the expense of the status quo. The ultimate goal of their grand strategy is regional hegemony; they want to dominate their east asian neighbors the way we currently dominate countries like japan and south korea. Its an expansionist power. Whether its "aggressive" for them to want regional hegemony or not isn't the point.
I think China's primary goal is a high standard of living for 1.4 billion people. Any country that seeks to prevent that will ultimately be seen as a menace to humanity and treated as a pariah or worse. I don't understand how being isolated from the world community is in America's best long term interests.
Why do you think that containing chinese influence / power in southeast asia means overtly harming 1.4m people? And why do you imply that the united states would be seen as more responsible for the wellbeing of the chinese people than the chinese government?
It is a painfully obvious fact that the United States government has become a wholly owned subsidiary of the American Israeli Political Action Commitee.
The USA should have helped Japan in WW2.
Commodore Matthew C. Perry sailed into Tokyo Bay with nine ships in March 1854 and forced Japan to enter into trade with the United States . . . Russia, Britain, France, and Holland used their fleets on several occasions to defeat and disarm the Japanese feudal domains that defied them.
The Black Dragon Society (Kyūjitai; 黑龍會; Shinjitai: 黒竜会, kokuryūkai), or the Amur River Society, was a prominent paramilitary, ultranationalist group in Japan. The Kokuryūkai was founded in 1901 by martial artist Uchida Ryohei as a successor to his mentor Mitsuru Tōyama's Gen'yōsha. The purpose of the organization was to keep the Russian Empire North of the Amur River and out of East Asia.
He's right that Israel has had too much influence in US, but I agree it does not impact the pivot to Asia...much. He was likely right that ticking Russia off was unnecessary, but the deed is done, and reversing would be more damaging than sticking with the current path as long as Ukraine wants to fight. Artillery shells wouldn't be used in protecting Taiwan in any event.
lets put it this way: Who armed Singapore? Where did Singapore get its guns from back in the day? "Pivot" will occur but is less relevant than most think. Economic and cultural issues will predominate as Russia and Iran prove themselves to be horrible and China stabs them in the back. Which first? (my bet is Russia gets the stab first)
That's exactly what I think. Russia can eventually sell oil/gas to China via pipeline, but while it is shipped via tankers, it's up to US as to whether they get through and do they really want to give up the economic benefits of trading with other countries.
Russia is not a great power. Russia is on the rocks and will splinter. the "Russian" federation ... really isnt. Russia is not the second strongest military in the world. It is the second strongest military in Ukraine.
It is unwise to post whilst under the influence of psychoactive substances. If you do so, you will be laying out the welcome mat for public ridicule as this unfortunate gentleman has done.
Thanks Prof. Mearsheimer. I am sorry to say the "split Russia and China, back Russia" boat has long sailed. I suggest you follow my line: split Russia into its constituent republics, and use the Turks and Finns as suzerains for the Turkic and Finnic republics, which leaves fewer for China to eat up. Russia will be reduced to Muscovy. The Neo-Yuan empire will be unwieldy and constrained by culture and governance problems to being unable to forge regional hegemony, too busy with the barbarians to weld the oversease Chinese together. P.s. I speak Mandarin and Russian fluently. You need to course correct your model based on the empirical facts, that just basic materialism.
By proxy。 You think the "Russian" subjugated states Like being Russia's cannon fodder in Ukraine? They are that. Muscovites dont die nor do people from Peter its only the stupid provincials who do and especially those who are not in fact Russian. Meanwhile, there are lots of very ambitious Russians willing to lie, cheat, steal, and kill, as everyone but Mearsheimer has noticed. Splitting them against each other is also easy to do: there is no honor among thieves. So yeah, encourage local rebellions, foster the typical muscovite boyar intrigue. I could pull it off with a staff of not even 100 selected people and for a budget of 1 million since it would require some media production.
That's ridiculous. If it were so easy and the Russian state were so unstable, that wouldve been done by western intelligence agencies a long time ago. I agree with the premise that there's serious tension between ethnic russians and various minorities, but the idea that a little prodding will cause the republics to suddenly (and suicidally) declare independence from Moscow is just not based in reality.
NATO – eine anti-weiße und anti-familienfeindliche Institution . . .
Nach der Apokalypse von 1945 wurden bekanntlich eine Reihe globaler Organisationen gegründet, deren Ziel die Aufrechterhaltung und Ausweitung des totalitären Liberalismus war. Eine der frühesten zu diesem Zweck gegründeten Organisationen war das Militärbündnis “North Atlantic Treaty Organization” oder NATO, das als militärischer Zweig des Globalismus angesehen werden kann.
Die NATO stellt nicht nur sicher, dass Washington stets internationale Unterstützung für seine Militäreinsätze erhält, sondern ist als Institution auch erklärtermaßen anti-weiß und setzt sich ausdrücklich für “Rassengerechtigkeit” für in weißen Ländern lebende Rassenfremde ein. Bereits 1999 schrieb die NATO Berichte, in denen sie Nationalisten für eine Reihe moderner Probleme verantwortlich machte und vor dem Einfluss des Nationalismus warnte.
Im Jahr 2023 veranstaltete das Militärbündnis in seinem Hauptquartier in Brüssel einen Rassengipfel, bei dem die Führer des Militärbündnisses dazu aufriefen, “homogene Einstellungen” zu bekämpfen und dafür die “kollektiven Geheimdienstinformationen” der NATO zu nutzen.
Tatsächlich ist die NATO ihrer Anti-Weißen-Agenda so sehr verpflichtet, dass sie sich offen dafür ausspricht, dass Institutionen umgestaltet werden müssen, um “inklusiver” zu werden, mit anderen Worten, umstrukturiert zu werden, um anti-weißer zu sein und aus weniger weißen Mitarbeitern und Managern zu bestehen.
Nato – en antivit och familjefientlig institution . . .
Efter apokalypsen 1945 har som bekant en rad globala organisationer bildats med syfte att upprätthålla och expandera den totalitära liberalismen. En av de tidigaste organisationer som bildades i detta syfte var krigsalliansen ”Nordatlantiska fördragsorganisationen”, eller Nato, som kan ses som globalismens militära gren.
Förutom att försäkra att Washington alltid har internationellt stöd för sina militära kampanjer är Nato som institution uttalat antivit och uttryckligen dedikerad till ”raslig rättvisa” för rasfrämlingar som bor i vita länder. Redan 1999 författade Nato rapporter där man skyller en rad moderna problem på nationalister och varnar för nationalismens inflytande.
Under 2023 höll krigsalliansen ett toppmöte på högkvarteret i Bryssel om ras där krigsalliansens ledare bedyrade att bekämpa ”homogena attityder” och att man skulle använda Natos ”kollektiva underrättelseinformation” för ändamålet.
Faktum är att Nato är så dedikerat till sin antivita agenda att man öppet förespråkar att institutioner måste omformas för att bli ”inkluderande”, med andra ord omstruktureras för att bli mer antivita och bestå av färre vita anställda och chefer.
Dutch. I just used a translater so I'm not sure I got it right. I suppose I agree nationalism is sometimes a problem although it can be harnessed for good but I hate it when it is required. What is not a problem are values and brotherhood among those sharing those values regardless of race or national origin. Easy for me to say from US.
My view is that the businesspeople and city residents are the ones who will ultimately rebel if the war goes on for more than a couple of years. The provincials will keep taking the money and dying, but the money won't go on forever. Proxy wars in certain places like Armenia and Azerbaijan have to be embarrassing, too. Hard to predict with any sort of certainty, but I know I don't think the static lines currently in place hurt too much, and Ukraine's naval actions are valuable. Maybe the Ukrainians will fold; that might happen if China helps out enough.
De NAVO – een anti-blanke en anti-gezinsinstelling. . .
Na de apocalyps van 1945 is er, zoals bekend, een aantal mondiale organisaties gevormd met als doel het totalitaire liberalisme in stand te houden en uit te breiden. Een van de eerste organisaties die voor dit doel werd opgericht, was de militaire alliantie "Noord-Atlantische Verdragsorganisatie", oftewel de NAVO, die gezien kan worden als de militaire tak van het globalisme.
Naast het garanderen dat Washington altijd internationale steun krijgt voor zijn militaire campagnes, is de NAVO als instituut openlijk anti-blank en uitdrukkelijk toegewijd aan ‘raciale rechtvaardigheid’ voor raciale vreemdelingen die in blanke landen leven. Al in 1999 schreef de NAVO rapporten waarin nationalisten de schuld kregen van een aantal moderne problemen en waarschuwden voor de invloed van nationalisme.
In 2023 hield de militaire alliantie op haar hoofdkwartier in Brussel een topconferentie over ras, waar de leiders van de militaire alliantie opriepen tot het bestrijden van "homogene attitudes" en het gebruik van de "collectieve inlichtingeninformatie" van de NAVO voor dit doel.
In feite is de NAVO zo toegewijd aan haar anti-blanke agenda dat zij er openlijk voor pleit dat instellingen hervormd moeten worden om ‘inclusief’ te worden, met andere woorden, geherstructureerd om meer anti-blank te zijn en uit minder blanke werknemers en managers te bestaan.
What is the concern? Israel's life would be easier if Gazans went to Egypt. There was talk of setting up camps there a while back but Egypt didn't want them there. Couldn't honestly tell you why. Have read for decades that Arab countries didn't want them and Egypt pleaded poverty recently. I couldn't tell you what the reasons are; could be they don't want social disruption but it could also be they just want to make life more difficult for Israel.
It looks like Israel is moving into central Gaza today. Should help in terms of getting supplies through Rafah as the odds of materials making it to Gaza City are reduced. Hopefully, civilians will finish evacuating. Appears as though it will be a siege but it is really too soon to say for sure.
Volodymyr Zelensky is an Israeli operative . . . Ukraine’s Azov Regiment Visits Israel: ‘Mariupol is our Masada’ . . . https://nationalvanguard.org/2022/12/ukraines-azov-regiment-visits-israel-mariupol-is-our-masada/
.
Why Do the Ukrainians Allow Their Country to Be Completely Run by Jews? . . . https://russia-insider.com/en/why-do-ukrainians-allow-their-country-be-completely-run-jews/ri27010
.
Zelensky, Biden, Satanism, War, Greed, Theft, Propaganda, Domestic Spying, International Intrigue, Treason, Sedition, FTX, Ukraine, Israel . . . https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/zelensky-biden-satanism-war-greed
.
Documents leaked from Soros’ “Open Society Foundation” show how the Jewish billionaire behind Hillary Clinton gave orders to the State Department and manipulated media coverage of events in Ukraine . . . https://nationalvanguard.org/2016/09/documents-show-soros-ran-us-foreign-policy-on-post-coup-ukraine/
.
How Christine Lagarde, Hillary Clinton and Victoria Nuland Funded a Massive Ukrainian Ponzi Scheme . . . https://russia-insider.com/en/how-christine-lagarde-clinton-and-nuland-funded-massive-ukrainian-ponzi-scheme/ri27390
.
Jewish Corruption in Ukraine . . . by Andrew Joyce, Ph.D. . . . https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2023/02/17/jewish-corruption-in-ukraine/
Nationalism as a policy of enduring geopolitical value should be more important than the delusions associated with liberal hegemony. In a related article from 2019, Mearsheimer presupposes that the U.S.-led liberal international order was destined to collapse from the start. John Mearsheimer! These statements you make are utter nonsense, and you are making excuses for the rule of authoritarian anti-human regimes! There is no such thing as liberal hegemony! And your realist view that "interactions between great powers are described as primarily driven by a rational desire to achieve regional hegemony in an anarchic international system" is inherently problematic and wrong and unfounded! The fact is that some democracies help their own popular allies everywhere because they defend themselves against the expansion of their enemy's authoritarian allies to maintain their own security! The realist perspective ignores popular oversight and control of elected officials and power, which is completely unrealistic! Even if one can't assume that the leaders of a democracy won't make bad decisions just by trusting their materialism, the oversight and control of officials and public power of all kinds in a democracy is effective in curbing such mistakes! The control of power in a democracy is the control of public power not to do anything wrong on a more realistic level! The realist kind of willful ignorance of the fact that people make decisions because of their own values that are not necessarily the same as other values is patently false! And nationalism is a narrow and grossly offensive value, and it is often used by dictators to incite hatred against foreign countries, especially democracies, to distract or even counteract the attention of the population from domestic conflicts and wrong policies! How can this be good for regional peace and security if the world is full of such dictators who incite hatred for the sake of authoritarian rule? Do you have the courage to answer me this question? And it is the regimes controlled by those anti-humanists who deprive people of their rights for the benefit of authoritarian rule that are the real hegemonies! Some countries oppose and attack democrats simply because of their extremely stupid and ignorant minds! It only proves that such ignorant people are not highly civilised. You rumour-mongering pro-authoritarian media always spread irrational disinformation under the guise of the so-called anti-mainstream media, pretending that you are the real deal! Stop playing such childish tricks! And you say "Putin is pursuing a realistic geopolitical programme to secure Russia's national interests in the face of the ever-expanding threat of NATO." It is even more irrational in the extreme! You are completely delusional in trying to rationalise Putin's invasion! You don't always look at things wrongly and imperfectly with your irrational realism of events! Ukraine is autonomously trying to join the EU in order to develop its economy, not NATO-initiated expansion as you claim! Your statement "If China's power is extended to Canada and Mexico is absolutely different in nature! Because Ukraine has legitimacy to join other organisations as a popularly empowered democracy and has no ambitions to undermine security, and Ukraine is not provoking Russia militarily! Whereas the Chinese government is an absolute authoritarian and anti-human government that does not even have a one-person, one-vote electoral system, and is itself opposed to democracy and freedom, China's political and military expansion with the post-expansion purpose of violating and destroying democratic countries is clearly illegitimate and will definitely undermine regional security! China's expansion for the post-expansion purpose of violating and destabilising democracies to maintain the stability of dictatorships is obvious, cannot be ruled out at all and is extremely probable! As a democracy the Ukrainian government and elected officials are unquestionably qualified to honour the choices made by the population in terms of economy and security! And what you are saying is a completely delusional attempt to rationalise Russia's invasion and crimes! And I'll say it again! The world is simply not explained away by your highly irrational realism with ignorant dialectical overtones! Rather, it is driven by a variety of values and ideas, like the famous saying that all history is the history of ideas. Only values that do not harm the rights and freedoms of the population can create peace and prosperity! Your claim that the US-led liberal democratic world order must be destroyed is also completely illogical and impossible! What is possible is only that the United States will no longer lead the liberal-democratic world order, not that the liberal-democratic world order will disappear from the world!
與自由主義霸權相關的錯覺相比，民族主義作為一種具有持久地緣政治價值的政策應該更加重要。 在2019年的一篇相關文章中，米爾斯海預設為，美國領導的自由國際秩序從一開始就註定要崩潰。 John Mearsheimer！你所说的这些言论完全就是胡扯，你这是在为专制反人类政权的统治找借口！ 根本不存在所谓的 自由主义霸权！还有你所认为的“大國之間的互動描述為主要是由在無政府國際體系中實現地區霸權的理性願望驅動的”你的这种现实主义观点本来就是有问题和错误的和没有根据的！事实是有些民主国家因为防备敌人专制盟友的扩张维护自身安全而帮助各地自己的民众盟友！现实主义视角忽略了民众对民选的官员和权力的监督与控制，这完全是不现实的！哪怕不能只通过信任民主国家领导人的唯心主义来认为他们不会做出错误决定，但是民主制度下的对官员和各种公权力的监督与控制是可以有效的遏制这种错误的发生！民主制度对权力的控制就是从更加现实些的层面控制公权力不要胡作非为！现实主义那种故意无视人们因为自己价值观而做出的和其他价值观所不一定相同的决定是明显错误的！而且民族主义是狭隘和严重侵犯人权的价值观，而且独裁者经常使用民族主义来煽动对外国尤其是对民主国家的仇恨来转移甚至抵消民众对国内矛盾和错误政策的注意力！如果世界到处是这种为了专制统治而煽动仇恨的独裁者那么这又怎么可能对区域和平安全有利呢？你有没有勇气回答我这个问题？而且那些为了专制统治利益而剥夺民众权利的反人类者掌控的政权才是真正的霸权！有些国家对民主人士的反对和攻击仅仅是因为其极度愚昧无知的思想！只能证明这种愚昧的人不是高度文明的。你们这些制造谣言的亲专制媒体总是打着所谓的反主流媒体的幌子散布不合理的虚假信息，伪装你们才是真实的！别再玩这种幼稚的把戏了！而且你说“普京正在推行一項現實主義的地緣政治計劃，以在北約不斷擴張的威脅面前確保俄羅斯的國家利益。”更是不合理到极点！你完全是妄想合理化普京的入侵！你不要总用你那不合理的现实主义事件来错误且不完善地看待问题！乌克兰是自主想加入欧盟为了发展本国经济，并不是像你说的那样是北约主动扩张！你说什么“如果中国的权势扩大到加拿大和墨西哥有着性质上的绝对不同！因为乌克兰作为一个由民众授权的民主国家加入其他组织是有合法性的，而且没有破坏安全的野心，乌克兰并没有军事挑衅俄国！而中国政府是一个连一人一票选举制度都不存在的绝对专制反人类政府，其本身就是反对民主自由的，那么中国以侵犯破坏民主国家为扩张后的目的而进行政治和军事扩张明显是不合法且一定会破坏区域安全的！中国因侵犯破坏民主国家维持独裁统治稳定而扩张是很明显的，是完全不能排除且极其有可能的！作为一个民主国家乌克兰政府和民选官员毫无疑问有资格履行民众对经济和安全方面做出的选择！而你所说的完全是妄想合理化俄国的入侵与罪行！我还要在说一次！这世界根本不是以你那极度不合理的带有无知的辩证法色彩的现实主义可以解释通的！而是由各种价值观和思想驱动的，就像那句名言：一切的历史都是思想史。 只有不伤害民众的权利和自由的价值观才能造就和平与繁荣！你所说的美国领导的自由民主的世界秩序一定会毁灭也完全是不合逻辑且不可能的！有一点可能的也只是美国不再领导自由民主的世界秩序，而非世界上消失了自由民主的世界秩序！
Gehen saugen eine Schrotflinte judenknecht.
Great analysis of where we are here in the west vis s vis Ukraine and Israel, how we got there, and how it seems there is no good solution. I was naively waiting for that good solution to pop up at the end of the talk - nope.
But at least an analysis like this gives people some facts and gets them thinking more about the issues.
Jews Albright and Clark (pictured in the link below) had NATO bomb Serbia so the IMF Jews could make loans for rebuilding and get control of Serbian iridium assets… while Saudi non-profit NGOs kept the KLA terrorists well fed and well-armed… Just like ISIS in Syria… their Zionist bedfellows on Wall Street want Ukraine for GMO grain crops . . . Monsanto (now Bayer), Genentech, ADM, etc., are all buying land with the help of the Jews at the IMF by giving the Ukrainian “Dill” idiots debt relief . . . https://cwspangle.substack.com/i/85711501/sodom-hussein-obama
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Jewish U.S. Rep. Adam Schiff (D), great grandson of Jacob Schiff (who funded Bolshevism, Leon Trotsky, and the October Revolution from Wall Street) is following in his great grandfather’s footsteps by illegally trafficking weapons with Igor Pasternak (seated behind John Kerry in the link below), funding foreign conflicts abroad... and trying to get Syria for the oil pipelines by blaming the Russians for another false flag... https://cwspangle.substack.com/i/85711501/schiffty-schitty-kike-adam-schiffs-collusion-with-oligarch-ukrainian-arms-dealer-exposed
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Sodom Hussein Obama's mentor Zbigniew Brzezinski (Mika’s father, next to Nasty Pelousy in the link below) was the monster in the Carter administration who armed and financed the Mujahedeen in Afghanistan to fight against the Soviets... after the Mujahedeen were armed with sophisticated weapons, the Soviets left, the result was the USA got 911, and women now can walk 3 paces behind the donkey, the Mujahedeen evolved into the Taliban, who evolved into Al-Qaeda, who evolved into ISIS/ISIL/Daesh... Brezinski, for all practical purposes, can be called the ‘Grandfather of ISIS’... https://cwspangle.substack.com/i/85711501/sodom-hussein-obama
Great John, as always. For the very first time I hear you explaining IR on the basis of religion: ultraorthodox jews. You always avoid to deepen so far in explaining IR, the bottom line is always nationalism. Search into religions and you will get and extra satisfactory cause for the behaviour of nations. Cheers, Toni Prunés, your Catalan translator.
Estic obligat a escriure en diversos idiomes perquè: 1. A la majoria de la gent dels Estats Units se'ls ha rentat el cervell perquè cregui que els jueus són la seva salvació; i 2., el seu anglès és una merda i no poden romandre en silenci el temps suficient per escoltar o veure el que òbviament passa al seu voltant . . .
El judeomessianisme fa gairebé dos mil anys que escampa entre nosaltres el seu missatge verinós. Els universalismes democràtics i comunistes són més recents, però només han reforçat la vella narrativa jueva. Són els mateixos ideals.
Els ideals transnacionals, transracials, transsexuals, transculturals que aquestes ideologies ens prediquen (més enllà dels pobles, races, cultures) i que són el sosteniment diari de les nostres escoles, als nostres mitjans de comunicació, a la nostra cultura popular, a les nostres universitats, i sobre al nostres els carrers han acabat reduint la nostra identitat biosimbòlica i el nostre orgull ètnic a la seva mínima expressió.
Els banquers jueus han inundat Europa amb musulmans i Amèrica amb escombraries del tercer món . . . L'exili com a càstig per als que predicen la sedició s'hauria de restablir dins el marc legal d'Occident . . .
El judaisme, el cristianisme i l'islam són cultes a la mort originats a l'Orient Mitjà i totalment aliens a Europa i als seus pobles.
De vegades ens preguntem per què l'esquerra europea es porta tan bé amb els musulmans. Per què un moviment sovint obertament antireligiós es posa del costat d'una religiositat ferotge que sembla oposar-se a gairebé tot allò que l'esquerra sempre ha pretès defensar? Part de l'explicació rau en el fet que l'islam i el marxisme tenen una arrel ideològica comuna: el judaisme.
Don Rumsfeld tenia raó quan va dir: "Europa s'ha desplaçat en el seu eix", va ser el bàndol equivocat que va guanyar la Segona Guerra Mundial, i es fa més clar cada dia . . . Què ha fet l'OTAN per defensar Europa? Absolutament res . . . Els meus enemics no són a Moscou, Damasc, Teheran, Riad o algun eteri bogeyman teutónic, els meus enemics són a Washington, Brussel·les i Tel Aviv.
https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/pardonne-mon-francais-va-te-faire
Dr. Mearsheimer always says China is America's biggest threat but he never elaborates. What precisely are the dangers it poses to the United States? And what risks do China present to the rest of the world, especially the so-called global south that would warrant an American military engagement?
It is a painfully obvious fact that the United States government has become a wholly owned subsidiary of the American Israeli Political Action Commitee.
The USA should have helped Japan in WW2.
Commodore Matthew C. Perry sailed into Tokyo Bay with nine ships in March 1854 and forced Japan to enter into trade with the United States . . . Russia, Britain, France, and Holland used their fleets on several occasions to defeat and disarm the Japanese feudal domains that defied them.
The Black Dragon Society (Kyūjitai; 黑龍會; Shinjitai: 黒竜会, kokuryūkai), or the Amur River Society, was a prominent paramilitary, ultranationalist group in Japan. The Kokuryūkai was founded in 1901 by martial artist Uchida Ryohei as a successor to his mentor Mitsuru Tōyama's Gen'yōsha. The purpose of the organization was to keep the Russian Empire North of the Amur River and out of East Asia.
Japan was attacked first.
China isn't a direct threat to American security in the forseeable future; what they threaten is the American led world order. Since the fall of the USSR, uncle sam has had the final say on anything and everything that goes on in the world, because no one could challenge our power. But, with the rise of China, we are losing that special status and are headed towards a world where we have to accomodate what china wants. Very uncomfortable for us.
The USA should have helped Japan in WW2.
Commodore Matthew C. Perry sailed into Tokyo Bay with nine ships in March 1854 and forced Japan to enter into trade with the United States . . . Russia, Britain, France, and Holland used their fleets on several occasions to defeat and disarm the Japanese feudal domains that defied them.
The Black Dragon Society (Kyūjitai; 黑龍會; Shinjitai: 黒竜会, kokuryūkai), or the Amur River Society, was a prominent paramilitary, ultranationalist group in Japan. The Kokuryūkai was founded in 1901 by martial artist Uchida Ryohei as a successor to his mentor Mitsuru Tōyama's Gen'yōsha. The purpose of the organization was to keep the Russian Empire North of the Amur River and out of East Asia.
Japan was attacked first.
Global south should generally try to play both sides of the fence but a breakdown in the global order would almost certainly be bad for citizens of global South. How bad would depend on threats/challenges individual country faces. There is no good reason for military engagement with China in my opinion as I think our interests are aligned but apparently President Xi disagrees.
Professor Mearsheimer has said words to the effect that the US was mistaken to do things in the past that were beneficial to China but many American's disagreed and hoped China would become a friend in much the same way as so many other countries did. By that I mean who doesn't like Japanese cars, Korean music, inexpensive iron ore from Brazil or the big one, inexpensive oil from Saudi Arabia. All of that could break down if we go back to the way things used to be and China appears to want a new system. What that system would look like has not been made very clear and appears to be defined as the exact opposite of whatever the US wants.
" There is no good reason for military engagement with China in my opinion as I think our interests are aligned but apparently President Xi disagrees."
Gaslighting 101, pretending it is China that is the aggressor and not the USA.
It is a painfully obvious fact that the United States government has become a wholly owned subsidiary of the American Israeli Political Action Commitee.
The USA should have helped Japan in WW2.
Commodore Matthew C. Perry sailed into Tokyo Bay with nine ships in March 1854 and forced Japan to enter into trade with the United States . . . Russia, Britain, France, and Holland used their fleets on several occasions to defeat and disarm the Japanese feudal domains that defied them.
The Black Dragon Society (Kyūjitai; 黑龍會; Shinjitai: 黒竜会, kokuryūkai), or the Amur River Society, was a prominent paramilitary, ultranationalist group in Japan. The Kokuryūkai was founded in 1901 by martial artist Uchida Ryohei as a successor to his mentor Mitsuru Tōyama's Gen'yōsha. The purpose of the organization was to keep the Russian Empire North of the Amur River and out of East Asia.
Japan was attacked first.
As I understand it, Mearsheimer's framework doesn't bother with labels like "aggressor." Basically speaking, great power states are either pursuing a status quo grand strategy or an expansionist grand strategy. He's an offensive realist, meaning he believes that great power states will actively maximize their security and power relative to their neighbors, in pursuit of regional (or in the american case, global) hegemony. The US was more or less happy with the post cold war status quo when they were the sole hegemon, and pursued a grand strategy of "mopping up" the last vestiges of illiberal rogue states. The rise of China to the ranks of the great powers has come at the expense of the status quo. The ultimate goal of their grand strategy is regional hegemony; they want to dominate their east asian neighbors the way we currently dominate countries like japan and south korea. Its an expansionist power. Whether its "aggressive" for them to want regional hegemony or not isn't the point.
I think China's primary goal is a high standard of living for 1.4 billion people. Any country that seeks to prevent that will ultimately be seen as a menace to humanity and treated as a pariah or worse. I don't understand how being isolated from the world community is in America's best long term interests.
Why do you think that containing chinese influence / power in southeast asia means overtly harming 1.4m people? And why do you imply that the united states would be seen as more responsible for the wellbeing of the chinese people than the chinese government?
It is a painfully obvious fact that the United States government has become a wholly owned subsidiary of the American Israeli Political Action Commitee.
The USA should have helped Japan in WW2.
Commodore Matthew C. Perry sailed into Tokyo Bay with nine ships in March 1854 and forced Japan to enter into trade with the United States . . . Russia, Britain, France, and Holland used their fleets on several occasions to defeat and disarm the Japanese feudal domains that defied them.
The Black Dragon Society (Kyūjitai; 黑龍會; Shinjitai: 黒竜会, kokuryūkai), or the Amur River Society, was a prominent paramilitary, ultranationalist group in Japan. The Kokuryūkai was founded in 1901 by martial artist Uchida Ryohei as a successor to his mentor Mitsuru Tōyama's Gen'yōsha. The purpose of the organization was to keep the Russian Empire North of the Amur River and out of East Asia.
Japan and Germany were attacked first.
I do understand why China feels vulnerable but aggressor is not an appropriate term in my opinion.
Here is an article describing how most people feel:
https://www.scmp.com/comment/opinion/article/3239853/if-china-hopes-grow-its-regional-influence-it-must-stop-blaming-and-start-listening?module=opinion&pgtype=homepage
John. You're wrong.
He's right that Israel has had too much influence in US, but I agree it does not impact the pivot to Asia...much. He was likely right that ticking Russia off was unnecessary, but the deed is done, and reversing would be more damaging than sticking with the current path as long as Ukraine wants to fight. Artillery shells wouldn't be used in protecting Taiwan in any event.
lets put it this way: Who armed Singapore? Where did Singapore get its guns from back in the day? "Pivot" will occur but is less relevant than most think. Economic and cultural issues will predominate as Russia and Iran prove themselves to be horrible and China stabs them in the back. Which first? (my bet is Russia gets the stab first)
That's exactly what I think. Russia can eventually sell oil/gas to China via pipeline, but while it is shipped via tankers, it's up to US as to whether they get through and do they really want to give up the economic benefits of trading with other countries.
Most comprehensive overview of the Israel/Palestine situation you will ever hear.
Which is more powerful? France or Russia? hahah je sais.
Connasse.
Russia is not a great power. Russia is on the rocks and will splinter. the "Russian" federation ... really isnt. Russia is not the second strongest military in the world. It is the second strongest military in Ukraine.
Still better than the US, which was the second strongest military in Afghanistan.
Russian Casevac lololol.
Whatever makes you feel better about losing to the Taliban.
You mean getting out of their way and then encouraging them to kill each other? Some of us learn from Russia )
eat shit fag
RuSSIans hate it when you point out they are a bunch of lying alcoholic thugs.
Eat shit fag.
It is unwise to post whilst under the influence of psychoactive substances. If you do so, you will be laying out the welcome mat for public ridicule as this unfortunate gentleman has done.
RuSSIans hate it when you point out they are a bunch of lying lazy alcoholic thugs.
Poka sukah, tiy poteryal.
Russia is a far greater threat than China, duh.
Thanks Prof. Mearsheimer. I am sorry to say the "split Russia and China, back Russia" boat has long sailed. I suggest you follow my line: split Russia into its constituent republics, and use the Turks and Finns as suzerains for the Turkic and Finnic republics, which leaves fewer for China to eat up. Russia will be reduced to Muscovy. The Neo-Yuan empire will be unwieldy and constrained by culture and governance problems to being unable to forge regional hegemony, too busy with the barbarians to weld the oversease Chinese together. P.s. I speak Mandarin and Russian fluently. You need to course correct your model based on the empirical facts, that just basic materialism.
How do you propose splitting the Russian Federation without fighting a war?
By proxy。 You think the "Russian" subjugated states Like being Russia's cannon fodder in Ukraine? They are that. Muscovites dont die nor do people from Peter its only the stupid provincials who do and especially those who are not in fact Russian. Meanwhile, there are lots of very ambitious Russians willing to lie, cheat, steal, and kill, as everyone but Mearsheimer has noticed. Splitting them against each other is also easy to do: there is no honor among thieves. So yeah, encourage local rebellions, foster the typical muscovite boyar intrigue. I could pull it off with a staff of not even 100 selected people and for a budget of 1 million since it would require some media production.
That's ridiculous. If it were so easy and the Russian state were so unstable, that wouldve been done by western intelligence agencies a long time ago. I agree with the premise that there's serious tension between ethnic russians and various minorities, but the idea that a little prodding will cause the republics to suddenly (and suicidally) declare independence from Moscow is just not based in reality.
NATO – eine anti-weiße und anti-familienfeindliche Institution . . .
Nach der Apokalypse von 1945 wurden bekanntlich eine Reihe globaler Organisationen gegründet, deren Ziel die Aufrechterhaltung und Ausweitung des totalitären Liberalismus war. Eine der frühesten zu diesem Zweck gegründeten Organisationen war das Militärbündnis “North Atlantic Treaty Organization” oder NATO, das als militärischer Zweig des Globalismus angesehen werden kann.
Die NATO stellt nicht nur sicher, dass Washington stets internationale Unterstützung für seine Militäreinsätze erhält, sondern ist als Institution auch erklärtermaßen anti-weiß und setzt sich ausdrücklich für “Rassengerechtigkeit” für in weißen Ländern lebende Rassenfremde ein. Bereits 1999 schrieb die NATO Berichte, in denen sie Nationalisten für eine Reihe moderner Probleme verantwortlich machte und vor dem Einfluss des Nationalismus warnte.
Im Jahr 2023 veranstaltete das Militärbündnis in seinem Hauptquartier in Brüssel einen Rassengipfel, bei dem die Führer des Militärbündnisses dazu aufriefen, “homogene Einstellungen” zu bekämpfen und dafür die “kollektiven Geheimdienstinformationen” der NATO zu nutzen.
Tatsächlich ist die NATO ihrer Anti-Weißen-Agenda so sehr verpflichtet, dass sie sich offen dafür ausspricht, dass Institutionen umgestaltet werden müssen, um “inklusiver” zu werden, mit anderen Worten, umstrukturiert zu werden, um anti-weißer zu sein und aus weniger weißen Mitarbeitern und Managern zu bestehen.
https://nordfront.se/nato-en-antivit-och-familjefientlig-institution
Can you send that again in english please? I dont speak german.
Nato – en antivit och familjefientlig institution . . .
Efter apokalypsen 1945 har som bekant en rad globala organisationer bildats med syfte att upprätthålla och expandera den totalitära liberalismen. En av de tidigaste organisationer som bildades i detta syfte var krigsalliansen ”Nordatlantiska fördragsorganisationen”, eller Nato, som kan ses som globalismens militära gren.
Förutom att försäkra att Washington alltid har internationellt stöd för sina militära kampanjer är Nato som institution uttalat antivit och uttryckligen dedikerad till ”raslig rättvisa” för rasfrämlingar som bor i vita länder. Redan 1999 författade Nato rapporter där man skyller en rad moderna problem på nationalister och varnar för nationalismens inflytande.
Under 2023 höll krigsalliansen ett toppmöte på högkvarteret i Bryssel om ras där krigsalliansens ledare bedyrade att bekämpa ”homogena attityder” och att man skulle använda Natos ”kollektiva underrättelseinformation” för ändamålet.
Faktum är att Nato är så dedikerat till sin antivita agenda att man öppet förespråkar att institutioner måste omformas för att bli ”inkluderande”, med andra ord omstruktureras för att bli mer antivita och bestå av färre vita anställda och chefer.
https://nordfront.se/nato-en-antivit-och-familjefientlig-institution
Dutch. I just used a translater so I'm not sure I got it right. I suppose I agree nationalism is sometimes a problem although it can be harnessed for good but I hate it when it is required. What is not a problem are values and brotherhood among those sharing those values regardless of race or national origin. Easy for me to say from US.
My view is that the businesspeople and city residents are the ones who will ultimately rebel if the war goes on for more than a couple of years. The provincials will keep taking the money and dying, but the money won't go on forever. Proxy wars in certain places like Armenia and Azerbaijan have to be embarrassing, too. Hard to predict with any sort of certainty, but I know I don't think the static lines currently in place hurt too much, and Ukraine's naval actions are valuable. Maybe the Ukrainians will fold; that might happen if China helps out enough.
De NAVO – een anti-blanke en anti-gezinsinstelling. . .
Na de apocalyps van 1945 is er, zoals bekend, een aantal mondiale organisaties gevormd met als doel het totalitaire liberalisme in stand te houden en uit te breiden. Een van de eerste organisaties die voor dit doel werd opgericht, was de militaire alliantie "Noord-Atlantische Verdragsorganisatie", oftewel de NAVO, die gezien kan worden als de militaire tak van het globalisme.
Naast het garanderen dat Washington altijd internationale steun krijgt voor zijn militaire campagnes, is de NAVO als instituut openlijk anti-blank en uitdrukkelijk toegewijd aan ‘raciale rechtvaardigheid’ voor raciale vreemdelingen die in blanke landen leven. Al in 1999 schreef de NAVO rapporten waarin nationalisten de schuld kregen van een aantal moderne problemen en waarschuwden voor de invloed van nationalisme.
In 2023 hield de militaire alliantie op haar hoofdkwartier in Brussel een topconferentie over ras, waar de leiders van de militaire alliantie opriepen tot het bestrijden van "homogene attitudes" en het gebruik van de "collectieve inlichtingeninformatie" van de NAVO voor dit doel.
In feite is de NAVO zo toegewijd aan haar anti-blanke agenda dat zij er openlijk voor pleit dat instellingen hervormd moeten worden om ‘inclusief’ te worden, met andere woorden, geherstructureerd om meer anti-blank te zijn en uit minder blanke werknemers en managers te bestaan.
https://nordfront.se/nato-en-antivit-och-familjefientlig-institution
'Israel controls the borders around Gaza, and it controls the air above Gaza. These are not disputable issues.'
What about the border with Egypt?
What is the concern? Israel's life would be easier if Gazans went to Egypt. There was talk of setting up camps there a while back but Egypt didn't want them there. Couldn't honestly tell you why. Have read for decades that Arab countries didn't want them and Egypt pleaded poverty recently. I couldn't tell you what the reasons are; could be they don't want social disruption but it could also be they just want to make life more difficult for Israel.
Professor Mearsheimer made this statement during the lecture. He even made a circular motion with his hands to visually support it.
So, that's what my question is about.
It looks like Israel is moving into central Gaza today. Should help in terms of getting supplies through Rafah as the odds of materials making it to Gaza City are reduced. Hopefully, civilians will finish evacuating. Appears as though it will be a siege but it is really too soon to say for sure.
My one comment: I am deaf. Please do transcriptions.
Thank you.
I need a throwback Redskin Jersey with Mearsheimer on the back
Awesome