After the apocalypse of 1945, a number of global organizations have been formed with the aim of maintaining and expanding totalitarian liberalism. One of the earliest organizations formed for this purpose was the war alliance "North Atlantic Treaty Organization", or NATO, which can be seen as the military wing of globalism.
In addition to ensuring that Washington always has international support for its military campaigns, NATO as an institution is explicitly anti-white and explicitly dedicated to "racial justice" for racial aliens living in white countries. As early as 1999, NATO authored reports blaming nationalists for a number of modern problems and warning against the influence of nationalism.
In 2023, the war alliance held a summit at its headquarters in Brussels on race where the alliance's leaders pledged to fight "homogeneous attitudes" and to use NATO's "collective intelligence" for the purpose.
In fact, NATO is so dedicated to its anti-white agenda that it openly advocates that institutions must be reshaped to be "inclusive," in other words, restructured to be more anti-white, and consist of fewer white employees and executives.
Does the world work on the realpolitik of bismarck? You can never be certain of the true intentions of actors? Could the Ukraine war be a pre-arrangement between China, Russia and the West? Otherwise the risk of nuclear war seems too high to be worth it. The intended result is China gets Russian oil (China may eye eastern Russia as their territory, unfairly taken when China was weak and Russia was relatively strong). Also Russia gets its warm water port and the west gets China pacified a bit longer. The war is about making ukrainians accept the terms and giving a reason for Russia's oil going to China. In a realpolitik world it gets very hard to figure out what the hell is going on and makes democracy seem a bit quaint. In the vein of realpolitik I have always found it strange and wanted explained parts of world war 2 history. It seems that 90% of European casualties were from eastern europe or Germany. Stalin had 5 times the number of tanks that Hitler had at the beginning of operation barbarossa. France was part of the axis for the vast majority of the war. If France had good intelligence on the Soviet Union in 1938, who would they be more afraid of Stalin or Hitler? The etymology of the word slave may give some insight to Stalin's motives. Was France interested in aligning with Germany for fear of Stalin? Was a German invasion of France the fastest way to that alignment? I'd like these questions satisfactorily answered. A realpolitik mindset breeds uncertainty. How much of world happenings are about managing the population herd? The U.S. has been below replacement rate fertility since 1970, partially through intentful government policy? Something like 25% of the current U.S. population immigrated post 1970 or is a descendant of those who immigrated post 1970. U.S. citizen interests and government objectives may not align. How do population issues play into international negotiations and how much of it is publicly known? It has been said immigration is the driving force of the economic miracles that the U.S. has experienced over the last 50 years. Of course farmers of yore would question an economic miracle that loses a quarter of the family farm. Convincing people they are the recipients of economic miracles while they lose a big chunk of their land is where the genius in economic theory lies. Mearsheimer may have a unique perspective on this being from University of Chicago. Is the low domestic fertility rate a goal of those in power? Of course we may have risen to a higher level of consciousness where procreation no longer matters, left the realm of the living, no that's just hippie dippie bull shit. Maybe the U.S. is the victim of an international conspiracy to destroy its society like the opium wars in China. What's the opioid epidemic again? Or maybe the elite have decided western society must pay reparations for colonization but then where are the reparations Asia paid for the arguably much worse Mongol invasions? Past the statute of limitations? Are the world elite managing the international herd using the excess resources of the U.S. while suppressing the domestic debate? Makes U.S. democracy a farce or a tragedy or both. Maybe the guillotine will come back in style.
It is a real shame we cannot read the article without a subscription. I imagine the author has some reasons for this. I don't think it was intentionally done. I imagine the author made an exclusive agreement with La Monde for this one article. It's not entirely improbable that he didn't know when he made the agreement that we would be required to pay for a second subscription. I do hope the agreement has a time limit for exclusivity. If we just wait, maybe we will be able to read this soon.
I also hope future articles will be published here at the same as they are published elsewhere and free from a paywall. While I know we are paying for whatever article this author chooses to publish here on Substack, not necessarily every piece he chooses to be published anywhere. Yet, I am subscribed to this Substack because I want to read what the author has to say. If not not everything he writes, then at least most of it.
Gee whiz. I'm sure happy as all get out that I am paying for your Substack and that you post an article that I get to read all of TWO SENTENCES and then have to subscribe to the publication to get the remainder. Sure would be nice to get the entire contents!
I totally agree. Unfortunately, if one were to hazard a guess there are copyright considerations play. Le Monde Diplomatique might be attempting to garner "view - subscriptions" via Professor Mearsheimer's column. But don't quote me on that.
It would be nice to have those articles that are placed elsewhere available on substack.
NATO = NORTH ATLANTIC TRANSGENDER ORGANIZATION
After the apocalypse of 1945, a number of global organizations have been formed with the aim of maintaining and expanding totalitarian liberalism. One of the earliest organizations formed for this purpose was the war alliance "North Atlantic Treaty Organization", or NATO, which can be seen as the military wing of globalism.
In addition to ensuring that Washington always has international support for its military campaigns, NATO as an institution is explicitly anti-white and explicitly dedicated to "racial justice" for racial aliens living in white countries. As early as 1999, NATO authored reports blaming nationalists for a number of modern problems and warning against the influence of nationalism.
In 2023, the war alliance held a summit at its headquarters in Brussels on race where the alliance's leaders pledged to fight "homogeneous attitudes" and to use NATO's "collective intelligence" for the purpose.
In fact, NATO is so dedicated to its anti-white agenda that it openly advocates that institutions must be reshaped to be "inclusive," in other words, restructured to be more anti-white, and consist of fewer white employees and executives.
https://nordfront.se/nato-en-antivit-och-familjefientlig-institution
Does the world work on the realpolitik of bismarck? You can never be certain of the true intentions of actors? Could the Ukraine war be a pre-arrangement between China, Russia and the West? Otherwise the risk of nuclear war seems too high to be worth it. The intended result is China gets Russian oil (China may eye eastern Russia as their territory, unfairly taken when China was weak and Russia was relatively strong). Also Russia gets its warm water port and the west gets China pacified a bit longer. The war is about making ukrainians accept the terms and giving a reason for Russia's oil going to China. In a realpolitik world it gets very hard to figure out what the hell is going on and makes democracy seem a bit quaint. In the vein of realpolitik I have always found it strange and wanted explained parts of world war 2 history. It seems that 90% of European casualties were from eastern europe or Germany. Stalin had 5 times the number of tanks that Hitler had at the beginning of operation barbarossa. France was part of the axis for the vast majority of the war. If France had good intelligence on the Soviet Union in 1938, who would they be more afraid of Stalin or Hitler? The etymology of the word slave may give some insight to Stalin's motives. Was France interested in aligning with Germany for fear of Stalin? Was a German invasion of France the fastest way to that alignment? I'd like these questions satisfactorily answered. A realpolitik mindset breeds uncertainty. How much of world happenings are about managing the population herd? The U.S. has been below replacement rate fertility since 1970, partially through intentful government policy? Something like 25% of the current U.S. population immigrated post 1970 or is a descendant of those who immigrated post 1970. U.S. citizen interests and government objectives may not align. How do population issues play into international negotiations and how much of it is publicly known? It has been said immigration is the driving force of the economic miracles that the U.S. has experienced over the last 50 years. Of course farmers of yore would question an economic miracle that loses a quarter of the family farm. Convincing people they are the recipients of economic miracles while they lose a big chunk of their land is where the genius in economic theory lies. Mearsheimer may have a unique perspective on this being from University of Chicago. Is the low domestic fertility rate a goal of those in power? Of course we may have risen to a higher level of consciousness where procreation no longer matters, left the realm of the living, no that's just hippie dippie bull shit. Maybe the U.S. is the victim of an international conspiracy to destroy its society like the opium wars in China. What's the opioid epidemic again? Or maybe the elite have decided western society must pay reparations for colonization but then where are the reparations Asia paid for the arguably much worse Mongol invasions? Past the statute of limitations? Are the world elite managing the international herd using the excess resources of the U.S. while suppressing the domestic debate? Makes U.S. democracy a farce or a tragedy or both. Maybe the guillotine will come back in style.
Is there no way you can release this article in English (or any other language, for that matter)?
Thank you Professor!
It is a real shame we cannot read the article without a subscription. I imagine the author has some reasons for this. I don't think it was intentionally done. I imagine the author made an exclusive agreement with La Monde for this one article. It's not entirely improbable that he didn't know when he made the agreement that we would be required to pay for a second subscription. I do hope the agreement has a time limit for exclusivity. If we just wait, maybe we will be able to read this soon.
I also hope future articles will be published here at the same as they are published elsewhere and free from a paywall. While I know we are paying for whatever article this author chooses to publish here on Substack, not necessarily every piece he chooses to be published anywhere. Yet, I am subscribed to this Substack because I want to read what the author has to say. If not not everything he writes, then at least most of it.
Thank you. - TD
The interview with Aaron was awesome and and as always so are you. Thanks.
Gee whiz. I'm sure happy as all get out that I am paying for your Substack and that you post an article that I get to read all of TWO SENTENCES and then have to subscribe to the publication to get the remainder. Sure would be nice to get the entire contents!
I totally agree. Unfortunately, if one were to hazard a guess there are copyright considerations play. Le Monde Diplomatique might be attempting to garner "view - subscriptions" via Professor Mearsheimer's column. But don't quote me on that.
It would be nice to have those articles that are placed elsewhere available on substack.