Fascist-loving, president-for-life fdr and narcissistic, dissipated, zionist-owned churchill are both war criminals. churchill in WWI AND WWII.
Just look at the quickly-declining & pathetic Orwellian UK today. Their war crimes may be justified by some (see Day of Deceit), but it's clear now it wasn't worth the lies and evil. Both those war criminals just LOVED 'uncle joe,' who stole the atomic bomb plans and took over country after country without any resistance.
But that's why the false narrative of WWII is so important to gate keep by narrative-protectors like victor davis hanson.
See the book, among many writings, called Day of Deceit.
He was more than willing to allow hundreds of sailors to die horrible deaths for the constantly-spewed "greater good" BS pretext.
He didn't care how America was dragged into another war that, as in WWI, 90% of Americans did not want. Just like racist war-criminal British sucker demoncrat woodrow & his Lusitania false-flag lie, fdr ignored George Washington's warning about foreign entanglements. The worst today is America's occupation by the genocidal ethnostate of israel. Founder Washington's speech & excerpt at the bottom.
"Excessive partiality for one foreign nation and excessive dislike of another cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real patriots, who may resist the intrigues of the favorite, are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people to surrender their interests.
The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is, in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements, let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop."
Insults will get you nowhere. Initially I didn't have time to read your responses, but now I will not, since I will not engage with an abusive person and one that even references me as a whore. I'm reporting your comment.
Unbelievable, It’s been publicly reported that Ukraine power is almost non existent, people, and businesses running on generators, but they’re winning the war again. 🙄
Israel has nukes and attacked Iran unilaterally w long range missiles. Israel was evidently surprised at Iran being able to counter attack w their own long range missiles. But the US is supposed to tell Iran they can’t have either but our buddies Israel can? Why would any country do that?
For a glimpse from one of our ghettos, see this weekly webinar from Doctors against genocide: From Gaza to Iran, from the Rohingya genocide to ICE violence and repression at home, we are witnessing the same playbook: dehumanization, criminalization, silence, and impunity.
The Times also supported US military violence against Iran—if with somewhat more restraint than the Post, asking Trump to “move much more judiciously than he typically does.” The Times wants him to seek “approval from Congress before any military operation,” and make “clear its limitations and goals.” The paper warned Trump not to attack “without adequate preparation and resources”:
Above all, he should avoid the lack of strategic discipline and illegal actions that have defined the Venezuela campaign. He should ask which policies have the best chance of undermining the regime’s violent repression and creating the conditions for a democratic transition.
One glaring problem with suggesting that a US “military operation” should be based on “policies [that] have the best chance of…creating the conditions for a democratic transition” is that very recent precedents show that US wars don’t bring about democracy, and are not intended to do so; instead, such wars bring about social collapse.
Consider, for example, US interventions in Libya and Syria. In both cases, the US backed decidedly nondemocratic forces (Jacobin, 9/2/13; Harper’s, 1/16) and, as one might expect, neither war resulted in democracy. In Libya’s case, the outcome has been slavery and state collapse (In These Times, 8/18/20). In Syria, the new, unelected government is implicated in sectarian mass murder (FAIR.org, 6/2/25).
Some 8 or 9 Middle Eastern wars were identified by Netanyahu in his 1995 book as terrorist states and needed to be taken out, and Iran was on the hit list. Those we elected into office accommodated Israel's agenda using our young men and women to kill and displace millions of innocents and allowing their countries to descend into chaos. The only one I've heard openly talk about this is Jeffery Sach's. No one else. There is film coverage of Netanyahu lying about Iraq's nuclear agenda, and info on Biden pushing that agenda, and so why isn't anything put in context, like Iran is the not the only ME country Israel has identified as a terrorist state, although because of it's capacity to respond it's a country we didn't get to.
An alarming truth revealed by retired U.S. four-star general Wesley Clark: After 9/11, the U.S. planned to take out seven countries in five years, "starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran."
About ten days after 9/11, I went through the Pentagon and I saw Secretary Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz. I went downstairs just to say hello to some of the people on the Joint Staff who used to work for me, and one of the generals called me in. He said, “Sir, you’ve got to come in and talk to me a second.”
I said, “Well, you’re too busy.” He said, “No, no.”
He says, “We’ve made the decision we’re going to war with Iraq.” This was on or about the 20th of September.
I said, “We’re going to war with Iraq? Why?”
He said, “I don’t know.”
He said, “I guess they don’t know what else to do.”
So I said, “Well, did they find some information connecting Saddam to al-Qaeda?”
He said, “No, no.” He says, “There’s nothing new that way. They just made the decision to go to war with Iraq.”
He said, “I guess it’s like we don’t know what to do about terrorists, but we’ve got a good military and we can take down governments.”
And he said, “I guess if the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem has to look like a nail.”
So I came back to see him a few weeks later, and by that time we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said, “Are we still going to war with Iraq?”
And he said, “Oh, it’s worse than that.” He reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper. And he said, “I just got this down from upstairs” — meaning the Secretary of Defense’s office — “today.” And he said, “This is a memo that describes how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.”
I said, “Is it classified?”
He said, “Yes, sir.”
I said, “Well, don’t show it to me.” And I saw him a year or so ago, and I said, “You remember that?”
He said, “Sir, I didn’t show you that memo! I didn’t show it to you!”
+--+
Project for the New American Century
+--+
Thanks to their commonalities, the neoconservatives in the US and the Israeli hard-right Likud party cooperated in a policy document, A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm, described as “a kind of U.S.-Israeli neoconservative manifesto.”
Published in 1996, the report called for a muscular US Middle East policy to defend Israeli interests, including the removal of Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq (which ensued in 2003), a proxy war in Syria (which followed in 2011), and rejection of any Israeli-Palestinian solution that would include a Palestinian state (one of the Trump administration’s motives for pursuing the 2020 Abraham Accords), among other objectives.
Membership in the neoconservative club had its benefits: it made Netanyahu rich. Despite his lofty legal fees, estimates of Netanyahu’s personal wealth amounted to some $50 million, already a decade ago. But precise, verifiable sources are lacking, due to his political office, dark donors, and extraordinarily opaque financial disclosures.
I remember hearing Clark years ago making that comment, but it bothers me that when talking about Israel and it's desire to take out Iran nothing is put into an overall context, that is in regard to all our Middle Eastern wars done for Israel's benefit.
I would expect Iran, Russia and China to jointly use conventional hypersonic weapons to destroy all Israel's nukes and nuke-capable delivery platforms. The 'research vessel' group China has parked off the coast of Iran can locate submarines under the surface, which is Israel's main nuke threat.
Interesting to me and possibly a factor in why Donald Trump may actually reach an agreement with Iran is Putin. In the section of the Whitehouse connecting the west wing to the residence, Trump has added a large portrait of him and Putin at their Alaska conference. It sits surrounded by family pictures and is in a place of prominence.
One could almost extrapolate that if Trump is connected to Putin deeply enough to feature their portrait prominently in the Whitehouse that connections run deeply enough to mitigate Netanyahu connections.
The added fact that his son in law seems to be very at home in Moscow and the Arab States would imply counter leverage against further major destabilization of the middle east at this time.
Trump has no loyalty to anyone but himself and as such his bromances are not to be depended upon for longevity but the fact that they're in play at this moment shades the seemingly lukewarm reaction to Netanyahu.
The US, let alone Trump, will NEVER 'reach an agreement with Iran'. The JCPOA was the last chance the US had to prove it could honour any agreement it made. The US made up any lie it could to not lift the sanctions, despite Iran 100% living up to its side.
There will be the usual 'negotiations' loaded with unreasonable and irrelevant preconditions, then the declaration that Iran is being unreasonable... assuming Trumpy doesn't repeat history and just attack during 'negotiations'.
The US is "not agreement capable".
All this is theatre while the US/Israel/Rothschilds keep playing the same old 'divide and conquer' game. The Rothschilds have been at this since the Napoleonic Wars, so don't expect them to give up any time soon. Schwab got slapped down for saying the "you will own nothing..." quiet part out loud, but with Blackrock's (a Rothschild-controlled outfit) Fink in power at the WEF, that agenda has been taken underground again.
Over 5,000 mentions of Rothschilds in the Epstein Files, with Epstein openly stating "I represent the Rothschilds", and yet no one 'notices' that.
Trump and Nutty-yahoo have played the 'we're having a tiff' bullshit before, so take all that with a Sahara Desert amount of salt.
Fascist-loving, president-for-life fdr and narcissistic, dissipated, zionist-owned churchill are both war criminals. churchill in WWI AND WWII.
Just look at the quickly-declining & pathetic Orwellian UK today. Their war crimes may be justified by some (see Day of Deceit), but it's clear now it wasn't worth the lies and evil. Both those war criminals just LOVED 'uncle joe,' who stole the atomic bomb plans and took over country after country without any resistance.
But that's why the false narrative of WWII is so important to gate keep by narrative-protectors like victor davis hanson.
How is FDR a war criminal, and a fascist.
He lied about Pearl Harbor.
See the book, among many writings, called Day of Deceit.
He was more than willing to allow hundreds of sailors to die horrible deaths for the constantly-spewed "greater good" BS pretext.
He didn't care how America was dragged into another war that, as in WWI, 90% of Americans did not want. Just like racist war-criminal British sucker demoncrat woodrow & his Lusitania false-flag lie, fdr ignored George Washington's warning about foreign entanglements. The worst today is America's occupation by the genocidal ethnostate of israel. Founder Washington's speech & excerpt at the bottom.
Like all dictators, fdr LOVED the socialism of Mussolini and Fascism. Not a big fan of Hitler's racist, nationalist version of socialism though, even though fdr was a rabid racist. Redlining started under fdr (https://www.historynewsnetwork.org/blog/22404). During the 1936 Olympics, it was ACTUALLY racist demoncrat fdr that snubbed Jesse Owens, while Hitler welcomed Owens warmly ... we were all lied to (https://justice4germans.wordpress.com/2013/06/10/debunking-the-jesse-owens-snub-myth-from-the-1936-berlin-olympics/)
He brought people into his admin that were known Fascists.
He created the NRA, a 100%, Fascist-adjacent, unconstitutional agency (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Recovery_Administration) run by Fascist Hugh S. Johnson (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_S._Johnson)
1) https://mises.org/mises-daily/three-new-deals-why-nazis-and-fascists-loved-fdr
2) https://fee.org/articles/fdrs-economic-policies-were-closer-to-the-fascists-than-his-defenders-will-admit/
3) https://mises.org/mises-wire/fdrs-worst-perversion-freedom-four-freedoms-speech
-----------------------------------------
Washington's speech
https://www.americanhistorycentral.com/entries/george-washington-farewell-address/
"Excessive partiality for one foreign nation and excessive dislike of another cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real patriots, who may resist the intrigues of the favorite, are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people to surrender their interests.
The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is, in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements, let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop."
Bravo!!
and here's more war crimes gravy with a drizzle of treason
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/fdrs-crimes/
The American Conservative? Provide another source if you want to let people in on Roosevelt was a monster. Didn't he want to get along with Russia?
😆 listen to you
you are a snowflake
you just can't handle the truth
I'm not here for your satisfaction and attention-whore entitlement.
I gave you plenty of food to digest and start your own research.
But you WON'T, because you, like SO MANY in America and around the world LOVE THE BIG LIE.
Take care.
Insults will get you nowhere. Initially I didn't have time to read your responses, but now I will not, since I will not engage with an abusive person and one that even references me as a whore. I'm reporting your comment.
I reported you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
0
Unbelievable, It’s been publicly reported that Ukraine power is almost non existent, people, and businesses running on generators, but they’re winning the war again. 🙄
Well, they can't be truth tellers on this one, since truth would put an end to it all.
Israel has nukes and attacked Iran unilaterally w long range missiles. Israel was evidently surprised at Iran being able to counter attack w their own long range missiles. But the US is supposed to tell Iran they can’t have either but our buddies Israel can? Why would any country do that?
Real people:
For a glimpse from one of our ghettos, see this weekly webinar from Doctors against genocide: From Gaza to Iran, from the Rohingya genocide to ICE violence and repression at home, we are witnessing the same playbook: dehumanization, criminalization, silence, and impunity.
https://www.youtube.com/live/BBWX1xxrI10?si=Mh-AefqLtvIcbCM4
Christianity is no longer the foundation for our present occupied, blackmailed government. We are under foreign occupation.
😱 Sonofafukking bitch! 🤬
Hasn't been since the CftUSA. See the Treaty of Tripoli.
THe fucking feces gouging Trump, his sodomized girls, the golden showers, all that on Spy Cam footage . . . . There is no PUSHBACK on Adolph Bibi.
Sure . . . The Jew York Times and Jew-Smeared WA Post:
https://www.defenddemocracy.press/leading-papers-call-for-destroying-iran-to-save-it/
The Times also supported US military violence against Iran—if with somewhat more restraint than the Post, asking Trump to “move much more judiciously than he typically does.” The Times wants him to seek “approval from Congress before any military operation,” and make “clear its limitations and goals.” The paper warned Trump not to attack “without adequate preparation and resources”:
Above all, he should avoid the lack of strategic discipline and illegal actions that have defined the Venezuela campaign. He should ask which policies have the best chance of undermining the regime’s violent repression and creating the conditions for a democratic transition.
One glaring problem with suggesting that a US “military operation” should be based on “policies [that] have the best chance of…creating the conditions for a democratic transition” is that very recent precedents show that US wars don’t bring about democracy, and are not intended to do so; instead, such wars bring about social collapse.
Consider, for example, US interventions in Libya and Syria. In both cases, the US backed decidedly nondemocratic forces (Jacobin, 9/2/13; Harper’s, 1/16) and, as one might expect, neither war resulted in democracy. In Libya’s case, the outcome has been slavery and state collapse (In These Times, 8/18/20). In Syria, the new, unelected government is implicated in sectarian mass murder (FAIR.org, 6/2/25).
Some 8 or 9 Middle Eastern wars were identified by Netanyahu in his 1995 book as terrorist states and needed to be taken out, and Iran was on the hit list. Those we elected into office accommodated Israel's agenda using our young men and women to kill and displace millions of innocents and allowing their countries to descend into chaos. The only one I've heard openly talk about this is Jeffery Sach's. No one else. There is film coverage of Netanyahu lying about Iraq's nuclear agenda, and info on Biden pushing that agenda, and so why isn't anything put in context, like Iran is the not the only ME country Israel has identified as a terrorist state, although because of it's capacity to respond it's a country we didn't get to.
Israel is by far the preeminent terrorist state in the world today, and has been for decades.
I forgot to add, With the probable exception of the USA.
Did you skip Geography classes at school then?
An alarming truth revealed by retired U.S. four-star general Wesley Clark: After 9/11, the U.S. planned to take out seven countries in five years, "starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran."
About ten days after 9/11, I went through the Pentagon and I saw Secretary Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz. I went downstairs just to say hello to some of the people on the Joint Staff who used to work for me, and one of the generals called me in. He said, “Sir, you’ve got to come in and talk to me a second.”
I said, “Well, you’re too busy.” He said, “No, no.”
He says, “We’ve made the decision we’re going to war with Iraq.” This was on or about the 20th of September.
I said, “We’re going to war with Iraq? Why?”
He said, “I don’t know.”
He said, “I guess they don’t know what else to do.”
So I said, “Well, did they find some information connecting Saddam to al-Qaeda?”
He said, “No, no.” He says, “There’s nothing new that way. They just made the decision to go to war with Iraq.”
He said, “I guess it’s like we don’t know what to do about terrorists, but we’ve got a good military and we can take down governments.”
And he said, “I guess if the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem has to look like a nail.”
So I came back to see him a few weeks later, and by that time we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said, “Are we still going to war with Iraq?”
And he said, “Oh, it’s worse than that.” He reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper. And he said, “I just got this down from upstairs” — meaning the Secretary of Defense’s office — “today.” And he said, “This is a memo that describes how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.”
I said, “Is it classified?”
He said, “Yes, sir.”
I said, “Well, don’t show it to me.” And I saw him a year or so ago, and I said, “You remember that?”
He said, “Sir, I didn’t show you that memo! I didn’t show it to you!”
+--+
Project for the New American Century
+--+
Thanks to their commonalities, the neoconservatives in the US and the Israeli hard-right Likud party cooperated in a policy document, A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm, described as “a kind of U.S.-Israeli neoconservative manifesto.”
Published in 1996, the report called for a muscular US Middle East policy to defend Israeli interests, including the removal of Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq (which ensued in 2003), a proxy war in Syria (which followed in 2011), and rejection of any Israeli-Palestinian solution that would include a Palestinian state (one of the Trump administration’s motives for pursuing the 2020 Abraham Accords), among other objectives.
Membership in the neoconservative club had its benefits: it made Netanyahu rich. Despite his lofty legal fees, estimates of Netanyahu’s personal wealth amounted to some $50 million, already a decade ago. But precise, verifiable sources are lacking, due to his political office, dark donors, and extraordinarily opaque financial disclosures.
https://www.palestinechronicle.com/benjamin-netanyahus-lethal-legacy-revisionism-neoconservatism-big-money-and-corruption/
+--+
Enough of Sachs, man ................................
I remember hearing Clark years ago making that comment, but it bothers me that when talking about Israel and it's desire to take out Iran nothing is put into an overall context, that is in regard to all our Middle Eastern wars done for Israel's benefit.
Thanks for your great work John!
We've restacked and shared this link on 'The Stacks'
https://askeptic.substack.com/p/the-stacks
Now we have learned, that a conventional war does not make sense, neither for the US nor Israel. Question: what, if Israel goes nuclear?
I would expect Iran, Russia and China to jointly use conventional hypersonic weapons to destroy all Israel's nukes and nuke-capable delivery platforms. The 'research vessel' group China has parked off the coast of Iran can locate submarines under the surface, which is Israel's main nuke threat.
We have abandoned stupid Ukraine and resilient Palistine to the fascist powers that be. War greases their pockets.
So let it be....let it be
Or not to be
That is the ?
And the talknng head?
Their blowing it our of their mouths an aholes.
All wind no action
🙏
Interesting to me and possibly a factor in why Donald Trump may actually reach an agreement with Iran is Putin. In the section of the Whitehouse connecting the west wing to the residence, Trump has added a large portrait of him and Putin at their Alaska conference. It sits surrounded by family pictures and is in a place of prominence.
One could almost extrapolate that if Trump is connected to Putin deeply enough to feature their portrait prominently in the Whitehouse that connections run deeply enough to mitigate Netanyahu connections.
The added fact that his son in law seems to be very at home in Moscow and the Arab States would imply counter leverage against further major destabilization of the middle east at this time.
Trump has no loyalty to anyone but himself and as such his bromances are not to be depended upon for longevity but the fact that they're in play at this moment shades the seemingly lukewarm reaction to Netanyahu.
The US, let alone Trump, will NEVER 'reach an agreement with Iran'. The JCPOA was the last chance the US had to prove it could honour any agreement it made. The US made up any lie it could to not lift the sanctions, despite Iran 100% living up to its side.
There will be the usual 'negotiations' loaded with unreasonable and irrelevant preconditions, then the declaration that Iran is being unreasonable... assuming Trumpy doesn't repeat history and just attack during 'negotiations'.
The US is "not agreement capable".
All this is theatre while the US/Israel/Rothschilds keep playing the same old 'divide and conquer' game. The Rothschilds have been at this since the Napoleonic Wars, so don't expect them to give up any time soon. Schwab got slapped down for saying the "you will own nothing..." quiet part out loud, but with Blackrock's (a Rothschild-controlled outfit) Fink in power at the WEF, that agenda has been taken underground again.
Over 5,000 mentions of Rothschilds in the Epstein Files, with Epstein openly stating "I represent the Rothschilds", and yet no one 'notices' that.
Trump and Nutty-yahoo have played the 'we're having a tiff' bullshit before, so take all that with a Sahara Desert amount of salt.
Agreed 💯. Thanks for sharing that great synopsis.
Don’t you mean israel?