On 1 December 2025, I was on “Piers Morgan Uncensored” talking about the April 2006 email correspondence between Jeffrey Epstein and Alan Dershowitz and how that related to Dershowitz’s efforts to smear me and Steve Walt in 2006, when our famous article on the Israel lobby had just come out in the London Review of Books.
Having Dershowitz attack you is the surest sign you are on the right course. Surviving the attack and being so vindicated years later: priceless! Never quit, John. You speak for the vast majority of US citizens (although that's not reflected in the MSM) on the issue of Zionist influence on the US government.
Dershowitz is a self proclaimed defender of war criminals, pedophiles like Epstein, and many other criminals. He is the one who needs to be tried at The Hague.
If it weren't for the cesspool of a society he helped to create and maintain, this scum would have sunk to the bottom and very quickly, in a normal world and no one would know his name. No one should debate this pigshit of a man with words anymore, nothing comes out of that festering carcass that we have not heard before.
I love how calm you are Professor when answering questions. I still think I should’ve attended Chicago University, precisely because I would’ve loved to be mentored by you. Dershowitz isn’t that competent after all. Would you debate him on Piers? That’d be so amazing as you would just destroy him in front of millions despite him being a “lawyer” from a top law school.
Dershowitz can no longer silence or intimidate people with your an anti-Semite if you are critical of Israel, that is one thing their genocide has put to rest, and a genocide implemented by a crook.
If someone metaphorically burns down your family home and every family home thereafter, it is not feasible to look that person in the eye with all seriousness that they are a sincere "person" during a direct debate. It is unconscionable. Dershowitz knows this is why they do not face him in person, imho.
I mean Traore is exposing corruption in Burkina Faso and elsewhere in Africa. The plunder of centuries and the poverty exposed needs a poweful activist to protect and elevate the people and the country and remove the colonial rape and theft.
You should have watched, since the old Dershowitz was not his old self, obnoxious and self righteous, those days are gone with a world that has finally seen the truth about Israel and is no longer afraid to voice the truth. Not perfect but it's coming!
He seemed less aggressive, more laid back, since he and others can't fall back on calling people anti-Semites if they are critical of Israel after their atrocious assault on the Palestinians. He may go after Mearsheimer, but I doubt it, or have the gall to call him, or anyone else critical of Israel an anti-Semite. Your right about him looking ugly. He didn't age well.
Dersh was roasted in an Israhell debate with Noam Chomsky many years ago. Chomsky calmly demolished him. All Dersh could do was lie and spew invidious aspersions like the punk he is.
If I was in court and wanted the best defender of reality against hate and bias, I would choose Mearsheimer and the logic of his realism as my attorney even though he is not a lawyer but one of America's finest political scientists. I would however choose Dershowitz if I wanted to get away with murder.
I am fascinated how Harvard which has always unabashedly proclaimed its academic preeminence, is such an embarrassingly so wimp when threatened by the Lobby or the Federal government. Its performance under stress is abysmal. Come on Harvard, wear some pants.
You are on the right side of history professor
Anybody who publicly states that the age of consent should be 14 or 15 has zero credibility and tells me all I need to know about him.
"Anybody who publicly states that the age of consent should be 14 or 15" hopes to snag one.
Or already has on many occasions and wants to rationalize it.
Anybody who thinks the government should stick its big fat nose into voluntary acts performed by sexually mature young women is an authoritarian.
Those thousands of women did not consent — in their teens, they were snatched and groomed (remember that word?) by Ghislaine Maxwell.
Furthermore, using your logic, which legitimately applies in this case, the government should get the hell out of women’s reproductive rights.
Rather ignorant aren’t you. 15 is the European age. I think higher is insulting the woman. The law does protect in the case of unequal power.
What do you think was going on in the case of Epstein or any other human trafficking ring?
Having Dershowitz attack you is the surest sign you are on the right course. Surviving the attack and being so vindicated years later: priceless! Never quit, John. You speak for the vast majority of US citizens (although that's not reflected in the MSM) on the issue of Zionist influence on the US government.
Dershowitz is a self proclaimed defender of war criminals, pedophiles like Epstein, and many other criminals. He is the one who needs to be tried at The Hague.
….and proud author of *The Case for Vaccine Mandates*.
Dershowitz was actually advocating for vaccinating by FORCE.
Dershowitz is in survival mode.
If it weren't for the cesspool of a society he helped to create and maintain, this scum would have sunk to the bottom and very quickly, in a normal world and no one would know his name. No one should debate this pigshit of a man with words anymore, nothing comes out of that festering carcass that we have not heard before.
Ah Dershowitz… Jewish supremacist, Zionist attack dog, and Pedophile lawyer: what a resume
I love how calm you are Professor when answering questions. I still think I should’ve attended Chicago University, precisely because I would’ve loved to be mentored by you. Dershowitz isn’t that competent after all. Would you debate him on Piers? That’d be so amazing as you would just destroy him in front of millions despite him being a “lawyer” from a top law school.
Dershowitz can no longer silence or intimidate people with your an anti-Semite if you are critical of Israel, that is one thing their genocide has put to rest, and a genocide implemented by a crook.
If someone metaphorically burns down your family home and every family home thereafter, it is not feasible to look that person in the eye with all seriousness that they are a sincere "person" during a direct debate. It is unconscionable. Dershowitz knows this is why they do not face him in person, imho.
University of Chicago. That’s ok. I like your comment.
Traore?
Seriously?
As If!
What do you mean?
I mean Traore is exposing corruption in Burkina Faso and elsewhere in Africa. The plunder of centuries and the poverty exposed needs a poweful activist to protect and elevate the people and the country and remove the colonial rape and theft.
Well, him an I are from the same lineage. My great parents are from Burkina.
The Overton window for Zionism is on the move and Zionists are scrambling to halt this.
Pym of Nantucket, you nailed it.
Great interview Professor
I found the interview very interesting, until minute 20:50 when I stopped watching. If I want to see venomous reptiles, I go to the zoo.
You should have watched, since the old Dershowitz was not his old self, obnoxious and self righteous, those days are gone with a world that has finally seen the truth about Israel and is no longer afraid to voice the truth. Not perfect but it's coming!
Nah, I prefer the zoo to see chameleons. This Dershowitz isn't going to offer me anything new. And besides... he's very ugly.
He seemed less aggressive, more laid back, since he and others can't fall back on calling people anti-Semites if they are critical of Israel after their atrocious assault on the Palestinians. He may go after Mearsheimer, but I doubt it, or have the gall to call him, or anyone else critical of Israel an anti-Semite. Your right about him looking ugly. He didn't age well.
Israel is like a bankrupt bank building. The building is still standing and its employees are still at their jobs, but for how long?
Hopefully not that long especially when the person in charge is a thief. https://www.middleeasteye.net/explainers/netanyahu-corruption-trials-charges-pardon-israeli-president
He is a criminal genocidal maniac. He would have been hanged at Nuremberg. And that's what he deserves.
Please publish a new edition of the Israel lobby. You can remove all the placating of zionists and add so much evidence we’ve gotten since then.
Dersh was roasted in an Israhell debate with Noam Chomsky many years ago. Chomsky calmly demolished him. All Dersh could do was lie and spew invidious aspersions like the punk he is.
Don't insult punks!!
Blessings and Gratitude to you, Professor. We would be lost without you xoxo
Re the double-homicide by the IDF in the West Bank: “there is nothing surprising at this point”.
100% correct: shame on those who feign surprise at seeing this after the past 78 years, let alone the past 25 months.
If I was in court and wanted the best defender of reality against hate and bias, I would choose Mearsheimer and the logic of his realism as my attorney even though he is not a lawyer but one of America's finest political scientists. I would however choose Dershowitz if I wanted to get away with murder.
Perfect.
I am fascinated how Harvard which has always unabashedly proclaimed its academic preeminence, is such an embarrassingly so wimp when threatened by the Lobby or the Federal government. Its performance under stress is abysmal. Come on Harvard, wear some pants.